/vr/ - Retro Games

>Americanized cartoon based on a JP property
>Bowser and Toadstool are completely off-model
>They couldn't get the Koopalings name right.
It isn't, but don't tell Preston.

>>3655010
You know what they say in Brooklyn...

>>3655010
Nintendo games don't have established canon. Shit just happens and characters go along.

>>3655021
Are you denying the deepest fucking lore?

>>3655021
>throw Mario in whatever
what are they gonna do, make him lose?

>>3655026
kind off yes. I mean the gameplay is solid enough to stand on its own but no one buys zelda games for the story or continuity

>>3655035
nigga i ain't talking zelda
Mario has the deepest lore

Fuck of hipster.
No one cares about Canon until you tucking morons came along we just had fun with the games.

>>3655747
I was making mario timelines in the NES days

>>3655018
you think JP cartoon is more canon?

as canon as this STONE THAT I MADE

>>3655047

>>3655747
canon is another way to engage the hobby you leave and a fun way to build a world around the events and plot that's told to you through whatever mediums the product exists on

no need to be such a killjoy bitter cunt about it

>>3655984
>canon is another way to engage the hobby you leave
canon is another way to engage the hobby you love*

>>3655018
They were all based about SMB2 design, the cartoon was right. And even in SMB1 peach / toadstool was like that.

>>3655010
>there's a fungus among us!

>>3655958
You didn't make it!

"Do the mario..": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65uNCLBTje0

>>3656238
It's a football, I chiseled it

>>3655010
I hope it's what the nips still base Mario lore on

>>3655957
>>3655010
>>3655018

Mario has no canon Everyone used to know this back in the day.

Now everyone just assumes there's a canon because the games have become more homogenized and lazy with regards to setting and enemy designs

>>3655010
is that the one with Captain Lou Albano as mario with the awesome link episodes on friday, or the one based off MB3?

>>3655962
Has anyone made an actual map? Which direction is the Flower Kingdom in? Bean-Bean is west, right?

>>3657051
>this is an utterly ridiculous abuse of the original LoZ tools
>but thanks to glitches it's something you can actually do in OoT

>>3655018
IIRC the Koopalings names were wrong because the show started airing within a few months of SMB3 coming out, and the US names for the Koopalings weren't finalized until after the production on SMB3 was supposed to start.

So DiC just made up their own names and went with that.

>>3657051
That is not how bombs, or shields, or even physics work.

>>3655962
I always thought as a kid that there must be a flower kingdom full of people with fire flower heads who could shoot fire from their hands. It just seemed natural.

>>3655010
As canon as MovieBob's fanfiction.

>>3657051
Isn't the new Zelda for Switch doing this? I swear I saw a clip of them doing this.

>>3655010
Although I like this topic, I just want to give fair warning that this probably doesn't count as /vr/, anon-kun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn92xL4G-zM

>>3655010
Only Tom Preston thinks it is canon so yeah.

>>3656407
I don't know who is more autistic, Dobson for being so ass blasted about mindless shit, FBulsara for righting all that crap or me for reading all that and agreeing.

>>3658109
The answer is Dobson for thinking the Amerocan cartoons which had no creative input from Nintendo are somehow canon or at all representative of the original creator's intentions for the characters. Double autismo is the fact that he still feels this way into his 30s.

>>3656407
>Zelda will no longer be your romantic interest

Zelda was NEVER Link's romantic interest until Skyward Sword.

>>3660861
>What is Zelda 2

>>3660869
A bad game.

>>3655021
I wish people would realize this about Link

>>3657116
You go to hell! You go to hell and fry! Take your damned physics to hell too!

>>3661586
>pic
Hey maybe they're on a planet with low gravity. It does look pretty scifi after all.

>>3663216
Sci-fi, shmi-fi, there shall be ordnance assisted vaulting either way!

And the "planet" doesn't have to be stuck with one particular gravity level for that matter either.

>>3657116
in what sense

>>3655035
I can't tell if you're trolling or really just this fucking retarded.

>>3657116
Hmm? It's physically sound, just incredibly improbable that all the factors would line up appropriately to pull it off.

>>3664349
>>3664501
But that trajectory though.

>>3655010
it's apocryphal.