/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3477270
Doom 64 is better.

>>3477271
And a completely different game, retard.

>>3477272
So? We're only talking about atmosphere here. And Doom 64's atmosphere kicks the shit out of the PSX game.

>>3477276
I don't agree, Doom 64 feels really different from Doom imo. PSX Doom is just darker and more intense

>>3477276
>And Doom 64's atmosphere kicks the shit out of the PSX game.

How? Same composer, similar sounding tracks, and Doom 64 borrows the weapon and monster sounds from PSX Doom.

>>3477271
>majority of the maps are garbage
>shitty animations; shotgun reload animation is a joke
>missing more enemies than PSX Doom
>better

k

>>3477271
Agree.

>>3477297
Solid contribution to the thread, namefag.

>>3477306
Fuck your ps1. Even Sony said no ps1 for Ps4.

Enjoy your low polygon and shit loading times.

>>3477270
Anybody tried the SaturnX port? I'm told it's kind of a mess

>>3477317
And you enjoy you blurry textures and screwed over musik quality.

>low polygon
Not much of an argument considering the N64 technically counts as that also.

>>3477270
I always felt it was out of place. The only reason I'd prefer the N64 port over it is they built a new game from the ground up to match the atmosphere they were aiming for as opposed to just making some minor tweaks to the original game.

>>3477317

>Fuck your ps1. Even Sony said no official ps1 for Ps4.

Emulators will be made

>>3477270
there's a PSX Doom pwad

>>3477491
Emulators wont be made.

>>3477461
Nah. Enjoy your jaggy textures and Metal Gear soild and Ff7 ugly models.

>>3477495
the PSX Doom TC is very good. Just download all the stuff on their forum page, launch the .BAT and voila, PSX Doom with the right music and sounds, and pc controls. There is a customization tool too

>>3477408
wasn't it slow af?

>>3477530
>Enjoy your jaggy textures
Still better than all that blur due to the sharper looking quality and texture variety.

>and Metal Gear soild
Is that even an insult? Even MGS' models look better than the likes of things like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark, with the latter looking even dated for its time.

>Ff7 ugly models.
Still better looking than the likes of Quest 64's models by far.

>>3477317
Triggered much? I'm just saying a one word reply is pretty much what can be expected from an attention whore, lol.

Take your meds.

Why would you need the source code for the assets of a port?

>>3477295
>majority of the maps are garbage
Very silly thing to say. Doom 64's mapset is very consistent in quality.

>>3477270
I understand liking the sounds and music, but the geometry is just simplified PC layouts (how is that better?) and the lighting is that janky faked color stuff.

And as someone else said, you can get wads that replicate most of that stuff, so it's kind of silly to want a "source port" of it.

>>3477842
>Doom 64's mapset is very consistent in quality.

Consistently shit.

DAAAAANYYYYY WOOOOOONNN

>>3477856
That's fucking weird. The PSX version is so great.

>>3477658
mmm... because I wanna see how this version of the engine works maybe?

>>3478157
and how it handles the lighting, the color depths and all that

>>3477523
well we can already run Linux on the PS4, of course emulators will be run on it. Only a matter of time

>Damn, I'd kill to get the source code of this port of Doom.

If you want to play PSX Doom on PC, you can:

https://zandronum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2644

>>3477562
>Perfect Dark, with the latter looking even dated for its time.

lmao, parts of Perfect Dark looked as good as Deus Ex

MGS isn't remotely comparable

>>3478427
>lmao, parts of Perfect Dark looked as good as Deus Ex


... which also looked dated for its time.

>>3479064
At least DX isn't a perpetual slideshow

>PSX

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>3479072
>At least DX isn't a perpetual slideshow

It literally was if you ran it on a PC with """"""""""""minimum"""""""""""" specification as written on the box

t. somebody who actually did

I can tell you Perfect Dark was buttery smooth in comparison

DX is notoriously CPU heavy. It was literally impossible to run the game at 60fps before 2002 because there just weren't CPUs fast enough until then.

>>3479147
I don't know what toaster you ran it on but I did just fine on a PIII, 256 of RAM and a Voodoo 4. By fine I mean no slowdown and maxed out graphics.

Anyway the point is you on the N64, you have no options. You couldn't have picked a worse comparison.

>>3479158
I ran it on a Pentium II 300mhz, 64 MB RAM and a Voodoo 2. The performance was pretty fucking shocking. Yes, N64 shooters were smoother, I even remember thinking that.

>PIII, 256 of RAM and a Voodoo 4. By fine I mean no slowdown and maxed out graphics.

Not even possible. I've assembled a retro box with a P3-S 1.4 ghz, Voodoo 5 and 512 MB of RAM, did some time demos and got about ~50 FPS.

Of course it's 60 or above in interiors, but exteriors really kills the FPS.

>>3479165

What can I say, too bad.

>>3478427
Deus Ex looks like ass for a game that came out in 2000 though.

>>3479172
still looked better than MGS though

>>3479176
...which came out in 1998.

>>3479182
came out in 2000 for PC

>>3477842
Wtf is janky?

>>3479210
lurk mire

>>3479185
I don't think you know how this works.

>>3479210
Dodgy, weird, odd in a bad way.

>>3477408
>>3477545
Supposedly the Japanese version runs better, but this should give you an idea of how bad it can get.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsosHnEh6e8