/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10351881
But an excellent survival horror.

That's nice, dear.

>>10351881
The forest segment is 10/10 atmosphere. Shame that remake fucks up precisely this

>>10351881
Which is also a description of your biological father.

>>10351881
Great game. Just becomes too actiony later, like all RE and Mikami games

>>10351881
Oh wow, you're not funny or original for having that opinion, you know?

>>10351881
Agreed.

>>10351885
It's neither survival or horror. It's an action game with arcade & RPG elements.

>>10351881
I don't like it because enemies are ridiculous bullet sponges. I enjoyed watching a let's play.

>>10351881
https://youtu.be/jCmmYF4rOwo?si=SCD6CKvgW-jbS3M1

>dude this game was revolutionary!
>has fucking tank controls in 2005
Nope sorry, can't take anyone seriously who defends this shit. You know what was revolutionary? Max Payne

>>10351890
It's literally just an asset flip from Village and 7

>>10351935
>You know what was revolutionary? Max Payne
One of the shittiest and most repetitive shooters. Should have dropped it at the beginning when it felt the need to kill a baby as edgy as it is

I highly doubt it's the first third-person shooter without tank controls

Extremely low quality thread

>>10351881
>>10351885
quite the exact opposite, it's a mediocre survival horror but an excellent third person shooter

>>10351881
how exactly?
in RE4 shooting enemies on specific parts of the body can stun them, you can knock them prone, disarm them, stab them, hit projectiles in mid-air, explode their projectiles in mid-air, set off explosives if they're holding one, set up a high damage suplex or a roundhouse kick that hits multiple enemies at once
and then there's things like kicking down ladders, vaulting, throwing grenades, jumping through windows, barricading windows and doors, kicking doors open to hit enemies
I've yet to find an over-the-shoulder shooter with as much depth. if you can name a third-person shooter released in the same year or before that can compete then let me know because I'd like to play it

>>10351881
>"great game is actually... le bad!" bait thread #4939

>>10351881
Dynamic difficulty should never be in games.

This game was very easy to beat when i was 13 year old

>>10351885
True

>>10351890
And /v/ normies eat this shit up

>>10352459
Really? I think you need my zombie balls down to your throat anon. Problem fixed

>>10351890
>ugly UE engine but actual understanding of the original's atmosphere
>describing image with blinding sunlight
not that it isn't right to criticize 4make but this pisses me off everytime I see this infographic

>>10351950
you're that one anon aren't you? the max payne isn't a really third person shooter guy

Sorry, I refuse to take any "gamer" opinion seriously if they dislike RE4. You're a subhuman monkey randomly tapping on an iPhone you stole from some child at the zoo.

>>10351918
What lp?

>>10351881
Its also a shitty Resident Evil entry.

>>10351881
The village is great. Has great pacing, amazing fights against multiple enemies and then there's all the shit you can do in combat (what this anon >>10352080 says). The maps are also pretty well designed to give you a bunch of ways to approach the fights.
When you get to the castle the game starts to get too gimmicky but is still fun. Only part of the game I criticize heavily is the island

>>10351890
As much as I loved the remake, this image is true. The "spooky village in the middle of a dead forest" atmosphere is just not there in the remake with it's random rock walls and lush vegetation.

>>10351890
Ruining the original game's atmosphere is a long standing tradition for Resident Evil remakes.

>>10353064
I don't know if I would describe the sparsely detailed pre renders of RE1 as having more atmosphere than the remake. I like them but they're really lacking in detail even compared to RE2.

This is a mediocre thread

>>10353064
Based. Original 1 looks way more relatable than that shitty Disney horror mansion in the remake. All those colors in the original are something kids know from their grandparents. Way creepier

>>10353064
Wtf the right is so much better! How'd they do it bros??

>>10352090
Welcome to the New /v/. No rest for the wicked here.

>>10351881
Yup, I thought so even at the time. All my friends were blinded by the hype and novelty, I was the sole person in my group that just wanted an actual Resident evil-game, not a bland as fuck third person shooter with zero horror elements and a high goof-factor.

>>10352717
Dumb opinion. There's plenty of valid reasons to dislike RE4. If you liked the earlier entries and actually wanted some sort of continuation in the same vein then RE4 is just a slap in the face. Completely different and very action-focused gameplay, completely different main enemies (las plagas), round-house kicking zombies, a silly/goofy tone (LOL Napoleonic midget big bad!), completely different control scheme, and so on, and so on. It 100% feels like they just made an unrelated game and just slapped the RE-name on it to boost sales.

>>10353679
I don't remember asking.

>>10353683
When you state opinions publicly, expect a response. Don't @ me

>>10352717
>This game I like? Yeah, you can't criticize it.

>>10351890
RE4 actually is underrated as far as the atmosphere goes. Its nice to see more are now appreciating it thanks to the remakes fuck ups. Yeah its action packed and hokey but the game actually did horror atmosphere better than the games before and after it in my eyes.

>>10352717
I wouldn't say dislike as much as not having any notion of respect for why the re devs created or its novel arcade action take on the tps.

>>10353762
*created it*

>>10353679
>completely different control scheme
this is pretty wrong? re4's control scheme is very similar.

>>10353679
>If you liked the earlier entries and actually wanted some sort of continuation in the same vein
Only the first 2 games are good classic style RE. Every other game they made pre RE4 was a total dog turd. RE was a dead franchise before it.

We know it's you auster, stop it

>>10353064
Contrarianism gone off the rails.

>>10353679
>a silly/goofy tone
The entire franchise is an homage to b-movie horror and had already been goofy as fuck up until then.

>>10355070
I bet you find The Haunted Mansion with Eddie Murphy scary too, because that's what the remake looks like

>>10354440
Who

>>10351881
Yes

>>10353464
Definitely fits the "this mansion is a ploy for umbrellas illegal activity". Built in the 1960s, not the 1600s. It's got that tacky 60s/70s feeling that adds to the atmosphere, while also throwing in oddball things like the room with the statue.

>>10351890
The blue tint to the fog is the craziest decision. Just turns the game into Eddie Murphy's haunted mansion.

>>10358207
>>10357061
>Anon who has never seen a movie that isn't the Haunted Mansion before: "Getting a lot of Haunted Mansion vibes from this."

>>10353719
Lol remake's atmosphere totally destroys the original. It feels like Resident Evil 4 done justice

>>10351881
mediocore compared to what? i can't think of a 3rd person shooter that even comes close to RE4 in quality