/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10251398

>>10240139
A modern flatscreen has less than 1ms of latency. But let's humour you and assume 3ms of latency: might have had a point with latency if you were playing modern games on a 240hz monitor, but a frame persistence of 16.7ms or more is significantly higher than 3ms, so any impact on reaction time is extremely questionable.
>superb motion quality
Lol. CRT's have afterglow up the arse, which I actually like because the main reason to use a CRT is the unique combination of its quirks and its ability to do composite justice.

>>10173701
I'll tell you what the real CRT meme is. "Motion clarity". You always see fags posting some comparison with the UFO to show how great the motion clarity is, but is that what your television in the 90's looked like? Unless you had some BVM none of you actually played games on, hell fucking no; your 90's set had afterglow up the arse. The biggest proof is the flickering shadows in fighting games; they would appear transparent on the TV's of the day.

>>10012594
>but fuck are LCDs blurry messes whenever anything moves
Yeah CRT's didn't have any afterglow bro

>>9878507
On a 240hz OLED? Whatever. I mean yeah fast-moving objects have slightly less clarity on a flat panel, but on a CRT even slow objects leave behind a persistent afterimage.

>>9739675
>CRTs are still clearer than 99% of LCDs even with afterglow
This shit you're seeing never happens on an LCD
I love CRT's but that's because of their obvious use case, which is old games through composite