/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3691198
Being out-argued doesn't make the other guy a "jewish weasel." It just makes you look like a pissy loser. You proved me mistaken on the DUHM + potion buff, and I acknowledged it and actually had a thanks typed out for showing me something new until literally your very next sentence was another ad hominem calling me a "fucking weasel."

>I do not agree with you that they're really any better than a f/m
I'm willing to debate the point, even if it turns out you're correct. Just about every other board where the game is D&D is nothing but people dissecting mechanics and good naturedly arguing over what's better. It doesn't HAVE to be us trading insults and attacks, y'know. If you think the F/M is better, lets set up some parameters and debate it.

>a f/m/t might be a small bit objectively worse than a blade, sure, but I prefer them for many small reasons added up, and as stated earlier several times, you can completely crush the game very easily with a f/m/t, so it's not like it matters
Rewind a couple hundred posts, my original point was only that people go so far out of their way to avoid playing Bards because of the stigma on them, that they take convoluted classes that are mechanically inferior like F/M/T and end up with what is essentially a Bard at the end of the day anyhow. I didn't say F/M/T sucks, I didn't say no one should play one, I didn't curse you and your house for liking one.