/vr/ - Retro Games

>>2215825
Yes they were patched later on.
Name me one AAA game from NES to N64 that was missing features or unplayable day1. The only thing coming to mind are some import games that weren’t really correctly brought over. If you can count those as AAA in the first place…
The point of the statement wasn’t that if a game receives a patch in its lifetime then it’s shit. It was that a game should release finished.
Just about all the AAA games in the last 10 years released needing a day 1 patch and/or not including all the advertised features.

Modern games are shit period. I don’t know why you're defending these shit practices. You’re not alone either. Got other people saying in this thread things like
>>2212962
>“I really, really dislike people who make dumbass sweeping statements like "MODERN GAMES SUCK".”
Guess what? Over 80% of the industry is EA and Activision. Every single game that make is a shit heap that is released unfinished and/or requires day 1 patching.
If you told me during the 5 th generation that video games are going to slowly decline over the next 15 years. I’d laugh.
If you told me they were not only going to decline but major developers would have the balls to release an unfished game. I’d say the video game industry would collapse before that.
If you told me those 2 things would happen and you have shit suckers like
>>2215825
>>2214474
>>2212962
that not only support it but will say that video game are still good. I’d say we’d be in nuclear winter before that.

Yet here we are today. Flooded with shit game and people that can’t wait to gobble them up.

Blows my mind.