/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10688446
/v/ tier threads were inevitable ever since Gen 6 consoles were allowed on here couple of years back.
>>10689814
>It wasn't always is the problem.
Anon, you're talking about well over 15 years ago. There's a reason why /vr/ was created by moot after all, and it was because /v/ was complete shit for years before then back in 2013.

>>9403571
>>9403581

Love how /vr/ is now just /v/ and has been for years now. Ironic considering /vr/ is going to be ten years old soon and now its become everything moot was annoyed with regarding /v/.

>>5993752
Except that was the original reason why /vr/ was created. You could argue that /vr/ doesn't need to exist either because ultimately these topics can exist on there as well.
Face it, you're in your mid-late 30's, you're no longer 18 years old and the PS2 didn't come out yesterday. It's almost the same age as the Intellivision was when the PS2 came out in 2000. Almost 20 years old gramps