>>6242731
>His reasoning for a port being worse is because the textures are slightly worse
They're not slightly worse, they're much worse.
> And because of this, the ports are so inferior, they don't bear mentioning as worthwhile parts of the Dreamcast's library
Correct, inferior ports aren't worthwhile.
>If there was a great disparity in content between the versions
There is a great disparity, one looks much better.