/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9962965
>>9962979

this, and I think most of the people screeching about zoomers on this board are zoomers themselves. Like I can't imagine being in your late 20s or older and giving a shit about any of that. I'll only call people zoomers when people make bait posts here complaining about games being "dated" just because that's such a sinkhole of a discussion point that has no merit on a board where every game discussable is dated by definition.

>>3921373
Argue with what? I really don't care. The board's not dying and anyone who doesn't like the community should just leave.

>>1260353
I actually read the thread this time, and gotta say, it's definitely possible. Could be one of the ways Itoi was gonna be a dick to the audience.

>>1262056
Also, it's alright you called me a lazy piece of shit. It's typical chan speak, I'm used to it, heh

>>702843
Eh; depends on what your standpoint is on it. You can emulate most, if not all of the X series rather flawlessly. Some people would prefer to save the trouble and just get a hardcopy with all the games already on it though.

The good X titles (personal opinion) would be 1-5. 6 is both brutal and complete rubbish at the same time. 7 is wierd because it has transitioning 2 / 3D stage layouts (also Flame Hyenard). And 8 is so-so; from what I've heard.