[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/vr/ - Retro Games

Search:


View post   

>> No.10770852 [View]
File: 386 KB, 1080x999, Screenshot_20240310_103524_Brave.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10770852

>>10770778

>> No.10769458 [View]
File: 386 KB, 1080x999, Screenshot_20240310_103524_Brave.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10769458

>>10769224
Anon you're a giant pseud retard. You're saying every game before GT was unrealistic and and arcade game because they didn't meet your headcannon line for what realism is. In GT1 and GT2 I can ram my car into other cars constantly and suffer no damage.
>I don't have turn signal options.
>I can't turn my wipers on.
>I'd be wearing a helmet in real life with different blindspots
Any retard can make a stupid arguement about some type of gameplay that goes from arcade to sim. You're criteria for realism is driving physics in a game where cars don't take impact damage. Why should I consider that any more realistic than need for speed 4 where cars can be disabled? Because they turn at unrealistic speeds?
>It's realistic to drive unstoppable mid 90s Miatas that can survive head collisions with road medians, as long as the turning is tuned
Please never voice your dogs shit opinions again. May god have mercy on your soul

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]