/vr/ - Retro Games

so is nobody going to mention how OP's pic inexplicably has a PS3 in it when every other console is 90s or earlier

>>9297626
>Nobody makes a serious attempt to emulate the exact delays of real hardware in either case.
this is not true whatsoever

>retroarch on a decent PC can easily have better input to video latency than real hardware
with run-ahead yes, but you're sacrificing accuracy to do this since you're rolling back every animation at least by a frame, maybe more. This is also compounded by the fact that input lag is inconsistent based on what's happening on the screen, although you're right that with a powerful enough machine it will stay under 1 frame at all times.


I'm not trying to shill people into buying a DE-10 Nano board here. I get that you can have a similar experience with retroarch. I don't think that its "better" than emulation necessarily. It just gets great results with less config needed and more flexibility. MiSTer is the only thing that can satisfy my autism. I currently have it plugged into a 1440p monitor and a 15HZ CRT at the same time, and it outputs to both. I use the CRT for 240p games, and I use my monitor with filters for PC cores and vertical arcade games. Having a setup like this would be a hackey mess on anything else, and take tons of hours of config and screwing around and be inconvenient to set up every time. With my MiSTer I turn it on like its a console, turn on whichever display I want to use, and it just werks. No per-game configs, no run-ahead, no messing with plugins, none of that shit.

I really do understand the animosity towards MiSTer though since a lot of people treat it like its some superior hardware just because it's expensive. I read a post of someone calling it "the ferrari of emulation". Most retarded shit I've ever read.

>>2332497
>assuming I'm yuropoor because I'm in a PAL region

Your ameritard is showing