/vr/ - Retro Games

>>6684094
>a must-own classic SNES title, a shitty homebrew game and two obscure Amiga ports
One of these things is not like the others...
Seriously? Super Metroid is still the best looking game in that picture.
Your pile of hogvomit looks exactly like those two obscure Amiga ports on the bottom but with shitty Genesis dithering.
>How many SNES games have you played?
Enough to know that the vast majority don't look like 3 out of the 4 games you posted.
Most of the audience for any retro console wants to indulge in their nostalgia. Nobody has nostalgia for the SNES versions of those bottom two. SNES fans want to play games that look like they were made by Nintendo/Rare/Squaresoft/Konami/Capcom.
Honestly you should have made your shitty little art project an Amiga game. It would have gone over much better in that scene.

>>6502612
You called it an argument bud, not me.

>>6484296
>No one said it didn't considering OP posted Tekken 3, and other anons have posted arcade games as well you nigger. If an arcade game looks exceptional for when it came out it counts, and Daytona 2 was among one of the best looking for 1998.
But I am OP, and I had the PS1 version of Tekken 3 in mind. The PS1 version known for being one of the best looking games on the system and graphically superior to the arcade.
Anyways, arcade doesn't count as it covers everything from Pong to Time Crisis 5.
Generational leaps are measured in consoles, but your point fails anyway because it was normal for arcades to have better graphics than home consoles all the way until PS2.
>No, it looks like a mid-period PS2 game, which is a generation over.
Anon... you do realize generations don't just change in the middle? Don't tell me you also think NES games post-SMB3 were part of the fourth generation.
And why are you denying the fact that Dreamcast and PS2 are both 6th gen? Is it because you're afraid of the other 6th gen consoles then being considered retro as they rightfully should be?
>No it doesn't, considering you said they look like PS2 games running through emulation, which they don't.
I said "I bet they would look even closer to PS2 graphics" which they absolutely would. Not a high-end PS2 game, mind you, but they easily look like they could conceivably be running on the same hardware.
>Majora certainly doesn't. It looks like an overtaxed game running on engine for a 1998 game. More over, I said "high-res" not "late" so learn to read.
You must be taking hallucinogenics if you think MM and OoT don't look incredibly ahead of their time. Even if that's debatable there are still all the other titles I listed.
More over, games that come out later in a console's lifespan often are as high a res as the console can do. I didn't think I'd have to explicitly state this to accomodate your lack of reading comprehension. Learn to read into subtext.