/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9065379
That's not plagiarism. It's close and pretty clearly borrowed from that work, but using the same arpeggio figure in an otherwise completely different piece is not plagiarism. At worst, it's a quote (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_quotation)), which is not plagiarism, not meainingful criticism and nothing to get worked up about.

You just proved I was corrrect in my presumption that you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.