/vr/ - Retro Games

>>6238729
It really is a colorful library

>>5859293

An obvious troll thread was just deleted, but I'd like to present a serious argument why PS2 should be considered a retro console by now. That is, if /vr/ existed in the year 2000 when PlayStation 2 was brand new, then going by today's rules, the 17 year old NES/Famicom couldn't be discussed on the board, even though it would certainly be a retro console by that point.
It's becoming more and more apparent with each thread on PS1 games that the two first Sony consoles are very tied together library-wise - much more so than any other two consoles of the brand. And I think it's especially important to start talking about PS2 seeing how it led to the fall of Dreamcast, a console that we can already discuss here. Tabooing PS2 jeopardizes the free exchange of opinions on that matter.

>>4980987
But anon, that pic isn't of a Dreamcast.

>>4905584

>>4868928
Dreamcast is my favorite console.

>>4684547

>>4634279
Dreamcast. Only shitposters and hipsters say Saturn.

>>4609060
Your dreamcast is backwards bro

>>4466709
And here's a Dreamcast webm

Dreamcast chart

Just the basics but all worthwhile.

Also have this

>>3978649
>...The conversation was fucking retarded lol.
Conversation always goes down to the level of the lowest common denominator.
When you don't have to try to explain to an intoxicated person what you are thinking, you can have rather more interesting ideas. I write down notes when a cool thought strikes me. Most of them aren't /vr/ related, but to be on-topic here's one that was.

>>3893873

>>3873797
I should finish working on these.

For reference, here's the last version of the Dreamcast chart I made.

I can only fit 35 cells into a chart small enough to fit on most screens (and many web browsers don't allow you to easily zoom on webms), so these are somewhat limited. I may do genre-specific or Japan-only etc. charts at some point, or just release the source code if necessary.