/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10308339

>>9898504

>>9238778
>implying I need you
Sad

>>9022207

no

>>7468698
>You still can't elaborate
I already did, >>7467094
>Deep, intricate mechanics
Never claimed that. Since you're mischaracterizing my stance rather than refuting it, you've conceded.

My stance this entire time has been
>It's still a good game
And the fact that so many people are getting their panties all twisted up about my opinion is entirely inconsequential to me and only demonstrates their own insecurity regarding the enjoyment of their games. All anyone can offer in response is "well I didn't like it so it's objectively bad", while ignoring that they apparently treat games like disposable goods, to be consumed and then disposed of. That's why I like arcade gameplay, there is always room for improvement much like your argumentation

>>7421563
It's to signify a poster being in a thread before an inevitable response is posted. It's not interesting to add that you're "in before" a post if you're the OP. In this case you may as well write "I am baiting hardware purists because I want attention", that's effectively what you're saying when you add "inb4" as the OP. Fag.

>>7418001
Yes I can, because there's no Ubers. also
>Batman Begins
July 2005. You apparently have no sense of nuance or subtlety. NBD.

>>7389419
It uses multiple processors, which have cores, for graphics. You keep thinking innovation requires a successor, it doesn't. It had a successor, in many ways but you're just gonna say "nuh uh" again so

6541849
In your dreams

>>6492685
Because I post on topic when I'm not making fun of attention whore faggots. The fact you're apparently upset by simple conversation means you're LARPing as a 4chan troll which is actually pathetic