/vr/ - Retro Games

>>7772918
>So all people saying they've experienced don't count?
Yes, they don't count.
>First hand sources don't count?
Glad we're on the same page.
>You see, they've already presented the first round of evidence
This is not actual evidence.
>so now it's your turn to refute it.
There is nothing to refute, you haven't given any real evidence yet.
>Preferably with something better than "I haven't personally experienced it therefore no one has"
It isn't up to us to prove your conspiracy theory is wrong, it's up to you to prove it's true. Feel free to do that anytime.
>you massive autist.
Projection.
>You can dismiss it as being implausible, improbable, or that you just don't believe
I don't know. There's weird shit in the world. I don't hate the idea of it being real. It would be a neat phenomenon, if there were any substantial proof that it ever happened.
>but to say there's no evidence is just bizarre.
You have not provided any evidence that is substantial. You know, evidence that actually proves something?
This isn't just me 'looking the other way' at your evidence, you, so far, have not provided any evidence that proves anything. I have read every post in the thread. If you honestly think those posts proved a point or defended your position, I hate to break it to you, but you're wrong.
I think you need to worry less about how other people feel about your belief in this retarded conspiracy theory. I bet people who get riled up over people who don't believe in ghosts have a lot of pent up bitterness. I don't even really begrudge you for believing things that I personally believe are dumb, you're free to do that. My problem is just with your attitude when it comes to talking about your beliefs.