Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Become a Patron!

/vr/ - Retro Games

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.6125112 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, thepowerof50hz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
6125112

>>6125103
>he doesn't know

>> No.4485230 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, thepowerof50hz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
4485230

>people who don't

>> No.3487114 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, thepowerof50hz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
3487114

checkmate ntsc friends

>> No.2290669 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, thepowerof50hz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
2290669

obligatory

>> No.2272797 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, goldenpal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
2272797

>>2272785
No, you don't understand. Most PAL versions are NOT actually higher resolution. They are just upscaled to 576i, much like how most retro games are not 480i they are just upscaled to that.

Goldeneye is actually *natively* higher resolution in PAL.

>> No.1791228 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, goldeneye.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
1791228

>>1791215
Only N64 games by Rare took advantage of the extra PAL resolution on consoles. I can't think of anywhere place where it happened.

>> No.1772159 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, goldeneye.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
1772159

Daily reminder.

The PAL version has no borders, the NTSC version has borders.

The PAL version is a higher resolution, the NTSC version is a lower resolution.

The PAL version is a mostly stable 25fps, the NTSC version usually drops to 25fps anyway.

The PAL version has some minor improvements and assorted bug fixes, the NTSC version doesn't.

Both versions run at the same speed.

Goldeneye PAL (50hz) is the definite version. Based Rare.

>> No.1738535 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, goldeneye.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
1738535

>>1738494
Meanwhile at Rareware...

>> No.1724764 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, goldeneye.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
1724764

>>1724740
>tfw Rare on N64 actually made PAL versions better than the NTSC version

>> No.1255308 [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, goldeneye.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
1255308

>>1254302
>And finally how bad are PAL versions generally on the system?

>> No.1231725 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 55 KB, 640x395, goldeneye.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
1231725

Why are you playing the inferior version of Goldeneye?

http://tcrf.net/GoldenEye_007_(Nintendo_64)



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]