/vr/ - Retro Games

>>7474218
>t's basically just meaningless buzzwords and emotional bias (due to the fact that they spent hundreds of dollars to play snes roms and they need to feel superior for it no matter what)
There are actual technical reasons for the so-called perception between the two display technologies that we could argue all day about. But you've got the right idea, it's easier to just act an armchair psychologist and then fuck off from the thread feeling validated.

>You want the best? you're gonna have to pony up for expensive RGB cables and switchers to go along with that pvm you overpaid for, it's okay, I know a guy who can sell you just the right gear ;)
>What? you invested in RGB? hahaha dumb goy, it's all about COMPONENT video now. Buy these expensive cables and component switchers now ;)
>LOL YOU ACTUALLY INVESTED IN COMPONENT? IT'S ALL ABOUT S-VIDEO NOW YOU FUCKING RETARD. IT'S OkAY THOUGH, I KNOW A GUY WHO CAN SELL YOU PRISTINE S-VIDEO CABLES SO YOU CAN GET THAT ARTISNAL S-VIDEO LOOK ;););)

>>2335792
>I can't afford a PVM
I payed $20 for my 1271q and $30 for my 1353md with another 20" monitor. You can afford a PVM friend, you just gotta know where to look.