/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3760017

>>1686925
> I know it is the creators and people who fund the creators. if they think that a game with a female protag won't sell, the designer won't get his (her) game funded

Game companies want to make money and would rather not dabble into politics if it means they won't make profit. color me shocked.

>hey, maybe 4chan is super progressive
>4chan
>progressive
lol

> I would have to narrow that and say /vr/ is super progressive
but /vr/ shouldn't be progessive, I came here to talk about retro vidya, not politics. if I wanted politics, I would fuck off to /pol/

> but, when you have the people behind Assassin's Creed saying female characters aren't worth it because they are too much trouble to code, you have a problem. this was said at THIS E3. Assassins Creed was created, in part, by a woman, and AS Black Flag tries to accurately recreate the entire Caribbean, yet coding a girl assassin is hard? that sounds like a bullshit excuse, to me

bro, do you have any fucking clue how long it takes to make a game these days. It's not the 90s anymore. the game is coming out this October and unbisoft sure as fuck doesn't wanna delay it. They would not only have to re-create the models, they would have to go through the lengthy process of animating the models, hire more people to voice the characteres. It's not just that, the game is almost done. It's at the point they might as well re-do the game if they wanted to incorporate a female character who has a significant or important role in the game. since they would have to go through all the work (again) to accommodate some politically correct female character. wait till the next assassins creed anon.