/vr/ - Retro Games

>>8118746
>Super Mario RPG to the mainline series.
I enjoyed the story and world, also the art direction was far superior it gave me somewhat of a challenge when I was younger because at that point platformers had become much too easy for me.

>Galaxy
Something like this wasn't even fathomable before it was released.
>Super Mario Bros. 3
It was great for what it was and had intersting power-ups and levels, but it didn't stand the test of time.

>Super Mario 64
Innovative, but it was really just a tech-demo for what was to come. It aged poorly compared to the top row.

>, Super Mario World
again art direction and music. Those sprites aged like shit. Also it was piss easy even when I was younger, cleared the mondo levels with ease.

> Super Mario Bros. 2 is even D
piss easy, could clear it when I was 9, alot of repedative shit in gameplay, it's not even a mario game, it's doki-doki panic. Also many of the enemies like fry-guy and mouser are shit tier designs

>Why is Mario & Luigi Dream Team Bros so much worse than Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time? lol

Art direction went down the fucking toliet, Massanori Sato was ejected from art direction from the project and started making characters that looked like fucking reject muppets, and it was in a really dull setting.