/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3218491
because the first few levels are shit

but after that, the rest of the game is on par with dkc2, if not better

dkc2 = dkc3 > dkcr > dkc > dk64
But that's just my opinion

>>862187
>diddy's conquest

>>772068
he said SNES
do you even reading comprehension?

>>615186
I'm sick of having this discussion so I'll just paste what some anon said in the last zsnes troll thread:

"It's hated because people continue to use it despite there being much more accurate software out there, all for free.

Back when ZSNES was in the most influential stages of its development, PC hardware was many orders of magnitude slower than it is now. To make an emulator that ran on the average home user's PC at the time, it needed to focus on speed rather than accuracy. To do this, various hacks and other bugfixes were implemented on a per-game basis to increase speed and hide errors in the emulation, most frequently with popular games of the time that people wanted to play (Mario, Zelda, etc.). Additionally, the emulator was written in x86 assembly rather than a higher level, portable language in order to maximize speed.

As time progressed, the average home computer increased in speed and capability enough to accurately emulate many components of the SNES that had previously relied on "close enough" hacks like those seen in ZSNES. This resulted in the modern versions of SNES9X and BSNES/Higan. With processing power in abundance and no longer the primary concern of the emulator, accurate emulation is now viable.

Therefore, don't use ZSNES, it's a relic from another era just like NESticle. It served its purpose, now let it die."