/vr/ - Retro Games

>>5713769

>>2535396
>but their meaning and intent are obvious to anyone not looking for a loophole to get away with something.
Are you kidding me? If the rules weren't ambiguous, people wouldn't have multiple interpretations of them to begin with. While you're firmly set in your definition of the rules, there's no reason why a person can't see the rules any different. People aren't malicious with their interpretations to the rules, though you're certainly trying to enforce your definition as much as possible. There is no single correct interpretation the way the rules are laid out now.

>>1624845
>Being that cheap

>>1410918
>Playing as anyone
>Let the AI handle the fight, or "fight for me" or whatever it was called
>instalose a fight that should have been hilariously easy
>mfw

Need a list of fun SNES games cause I'm looking to expand my collection but aside from the big name titles that everyone knows I'm lost please help

>>644545
>And Wipeout 64 is much better than the PS1 game.