/vr/ - Retro Games

>>2782606

Personally I like gba:sp more because its smaller, build-in battery dem clicky buttons and smaller size, and if you can find the AGS-101 model the screen is awesome, although the front-light one is alright for gb/c games too(but at times too dark on some not-retro games), you also need adapter to use headphones, but those are cheap and common.

Someone also mentioned the gba supercard, and I do not recomend it, its absolutely piece of shit all the way from build-quality to the software, it barely runs 1% of the not-retro games at full-speed(and most of them are unplayable or runs very slowly, crashing all the damn time). gb/c emulation is hit-or-miss, some games are fine, some doesnt run at all. Nes emulation has glitched music and graphics HIGHLY depending on the game, but most games "works" fine outside of gba's much smaller resolution.
For gb/c flashcard, get the gb everdrive. for gba, ez-flash IV.

>>2235801
>forgot pic

Which is a better Game Boy Advance, /vr/? The backlit SP, or the Micro?

Ignore the fact that the SP plays old Game Boy games, I want them judged as a GBA system that plays GBA games.

>>1247245

Don't bother with anything other than a late-model backlit SP get that and a wing grip if you have big hands and it'll take care of you. Going back I'm amazed how hard it is to see anything on the non-lit gameboys, and the Micros, though nice, are only worth it if you can get them under $30, which probably won't happen.