/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9097915
It looks alright. It is a more silly tone than the first though. Miss the pixel art.

>>9100684
It was kind of the personalities of those in the business of the days. If you ever listen to Ken Lobb of Rare/Microsoft, or the leaders at US Sega, or US Capcom branch they seem to have that self-aggrandizing attitude which may clash with the business culture of Japan. The butting of these strong personalities were a necessary process of the time, since marketing to a different culture/location required to make foreign things a success. Those critical decisions in their collaborations were probably for the best as you can see how it has progressed to how things are now.

>>4156137
>>4165726
>>4167696
The sequel appears to be cheap at under $20. I have watched some youtube videos of it and it seems very different in tone, like slapstick comedy. The main surprise was that I don't even remember the sequel in any magazines or promotions at all whereas the original was promoted so much such that I got convinced to get the original when it came out. Does the sequel at least have good puzzles or fun to explore?

>>3567027
It may be better that I stay ignorant of better ones, otherwise I'd feel really inferior.