/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3423761
>it didn't brought anything new to the table
What about the infinite bag, the faster movement speed, the beautiful graphics (5 looked like the NES games, very charming but not exactly good-looking), the class system and the battle skills? It also had some of the best characters in the series and a more complicated plot.

I think some of the previous games are better, but VI has a lot of cool stuff that the older games didn't have. It's worth playing just for that. The bag is a godsend. And even though you move faster that in previous games, the towns don't feel small because they were made bigger to compensate for that.

Of course, you can have all that modern stuff in the previous games if you play remakes. But I strongly dislike the art direction in most of them, so I prefer the originals.

>>3389319
She will never appear in a console remake either.

DQ4: PS1

DQ5: PS2

DQ6: Fucking DS with the Plus Alpha localization

>>3352193
I don't want it to get more western releases. They will never drop the pun and accent crap. Remember what happened with IV? It got a horrible official release and nobody will ever do a fan translation because "it's already translated". The PS1 version will remain untranslated forever too, even though it's a much better game, just because it looks the same.

Fuck Square Enix.

>>426764

>Yet I haven't experienced that in Pokemon

You must have been playing some very selective Pokemon. Or avoiding all cave/grass areas possible.

>>426750

I can agree to this, except maybe Chrono Trigger is slightly better than DQV. But the remake of DQV on DS is right up there with the rest.

I also think DQIV is just as good as III.