/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3642318
>isn't that brutal doom
yes, that's the point.

>cod statement
you might want to reread what he wrote because he was literally referring to brutal doom as COD, not whatever it is you might have thought. and it's a wrong thing to say even then.

also, and this may sound ironic with me saying this in the first place, but why the fuck do you care so much? your post just reads as a whole lot of whining about people discussing thoughts.