/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3514695
From what I've seen, literally every single thread that isn't a general will have a shitposter in it, and it's because they want to be included. And they'll be told to leave, further compounding the issue. They'll just go to another thread to spew their opinion at the expense of proper discourse.

>>3514698
>>3514703
What did I JUST say?

I don't CARE if it's met with "get out", DO IT ANYWAY. The only way we can move past this nonsensical bickering is by changing the conversation.

Break the cycle, for crying out loud. You're both fully capable of having an honest conversation, and here you are bickering about how the other party is being "unreasonable". Are you two SO egotistical that you can't swallow your pride and MOVE ON? Did you ever consider that you're BOTH the problem?

>>3514705
I don't see how you got to that conclusion, but whatever:

The real reason /vr/ exists is to get away from the shitposting on /v/ that gave it the speed it's now known for. That shitposting is what made it impossible to talk about those games.

Just because /v/ talks about 6th gen doesn't inherently mean people will come here purely to shitpost about 6th gen. Yeah, there'll be an increase in 6th gen threads, but that's only natural considering it wasn't allowed previously. It'll die down as topics tire out, and people can still freely talk about what they want.

I'll put it this way: People are clearly unwilling to see the generation that this website initially talked about be allowed, because they saw what happened to /v/. The trick is to not be so gullible that we're replying to bait and become the new target for trolls and assholes that want to get a rise out of a community that can't get over themselves.

I said it once, I'll say it again. The problem isn't the content, it's the posters.

>It's already an issue on v where you're lucky to have one retro or sixth gen thread.

That seems like the exact reason this board was made.

>>2816818
>>2816840
>Rocky
>Damitri