/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10734565
>>10734579
We don't even know if that's OP replying to him, for all we know it could've just been yet another tendie being annoying as they usually are, but if that's really OP then yes, it might've been all for an agenda, this thread in particular I mean.

>>10633916
Welcome, anon.

>>10634084
Same.

>>10634419
Eh?

>>10585297
>Video games are an entertainment experience. They're different from a movie.
Aren't movies ALSO an entertainment experience???

>>10524464
As a teenager I was a big defender of video games as art... but now? Well, not so much, they surely have other forms of art within it, and are passion project for many hardworking people, but it's still just entertainment, nothing too deep about it, just something fun for a few hours.

I don't think that takes away from the medium or makes it bad, I'd still rather spend a couple of hours with video games than with films really.

>>10527635
It's bigger than what's needed FOR YOU. When we say that a software is "bloat" which I mostly see when people mention Windows 8 and all of the other Windows editions after it, it's because it's FILLED with a bunch of stuff you didn't want, nor would ever need, against your will... and it's not the case at all for RetroArch, because it does come with pretty much nothing out of the box.

When you install RetroArch, there's an internal downloader for you to only then add the things YOU want to use, so RetroArch's always as big as it NEEDS to be for its user, so it's not bloat at all.

If you use a wrong definition, then people WILL call you out, not because you don't want to use what they use, but because you're stating false things to dismiss an useful software that works.

Also, on that 1st reply, if it was you of course, it was interesting how you'd mention RetroArch's got the "worst versions" of emulators, while we see most standalone fans here wanting to show off and feel superior for using 20 year old stuff over RetroArch... which is it, then? No, we don't care what you use, we just think your arguments for RetroArch's flaws are bad and we respond.

>>10527243
She's not an army man.