/vr/ - Retro Games

>>6954394
Peeps normally resort to save states when challenge makes the game a tad too suspenseful. But that's the entire point of action games. Imagine watching a movie, but whenever there's ANY sort of suspense, you immediately stop it and read a synopsis before finishing the scene, and then claim that you looooooove sticking it to the man like that and suspense is for losers and posers.
>>6954913
Rewind functionality in games not designed for it is as if there was a "quickly spoil me the plot before the scene has ended" button in a movie. It's very silly stuff that makes no sense. "Cheating" is a completely retarded angle that only serves to confuse people further, when in reality they're playing the game in the least enjoyable fashion possible, robbing themselves of the whole point of action gameplay, which is tension followed by a release and a sense of satisfaction.

>>6437209
I couldn't shake off the feeling that something was wrong about this video but I couldn't point it out either for a while until I finally got it.
Everything is just fine--except for the fact that they're taping it and uploading to the internet. Nothing wrong about that, but it's jsut weird. A girlfriend/wife bought an N64 for her husband because he's probably nostalgic. Alright! But why get a third person to film it and then share the video with strangers? That's just incredibly weird all around. Why would anyone do this? What do strangers have to do with this? Why would anyone want this to happen to them?

>>5820660
>Even 39 year old boomers think the rest of 6th gen and GBA should be invited to the party.
No, we clearly don't. That's your whole point of fucking contentions itt. Are you drifting off into some sort of denial now?