/vr/ - Retro Games

>>4851856
>The vita is MUCH more powerful than the n3ds. It'll be able to run n64 and possibly even some non retro consoles without a hitch.

Why are you making stuff up? Retroarch currently runs like shit on that device, whereas the switch can already emulate GameCube games and its been hacked like a month ago. Want to know why? Because it uses a standard arm chip with a GPU that's mainline Linux supported (through mesa). The vita is a locked down piece of shit with no support and not that many people even owning one. For a great n64 emulator you need people optimizing one for that specific hardware and that just didn't happen until now and claiming that some new exploit is magically going to change that is just stupid wishful thinking.

>There is no evidence that weaker devices have more trouble emulating? Bullshit.

100% speed, no dropped frames. What's the evidence the Xperia Play is too slow for GBA when it runs the emulator and the OS just fine? Why does the 5x as fast Nexus 5x have about the same amount of delay?

>Also, any emulation will have input lag, but good hardware will have actually LESS input lag then the real console.


>I'm a ex-PSP and ex-OpenPandora fag

No shit.

So am I. Here's Stepmania on an OpenPandora.

>>3437636
Is that so? It's all plastic, has a very cheap "feel" and it's certainly not a premium product. But honestly, what the fuck did you expect? EvilDragon basically had ZERO capital to work with and did everything by himself. This is a "mass-produced" handheld (~3000 units were produced during the whole lifespan) created by a team of 1 (with support by 2 others and one jew who almost ruined everything)

>>2221001