/vr/ - Retro Games

>>793927
Fuck off nitwit. This isn't esea.net you can go butter up retards there.
The CSS hitboxes are nearly the same. The head hitbox being the same size.
Seriously, find something about the fucking game before you start spouting shit.

>So now you admit it's easier, even though you claimed 1.6 'panders to casuals' earlier.
Exactly. It's easier when a game fucking WORKS PROPERLY. Or in this case, somewhat more properly you fucking retard. The fact that CS doesn't work right is a net benefit for people who can't fucking aim.
NO, 1.6 does not have recoil patterns. They are PSEUDO-RANDOM. RANDUMB you dipshit. 1.6 recoil is based on variations of randomization within a given spread. Both games of which produce nearly identical averaging spread and the way in which it does it. This isn't a fucking debate. I'm fucking telling you this. This is WHAT IT DOES.

>And to say that pro 1.6 players only used 'spray and pray' rather than primarily focusing on pinpoint burst-fire headshots proves again that you have no fucking clue what you're on about and have never even see a pro 1.6 match.

Oh is this your precious heat0n spraying because that's what 1.6 players find is more effective than aiming and bursting?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkaZ2cm24JM
Yes it is.
Spawn?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM-ezbXs4AU
We got that.
Here's your fucking homework. Find a SINGLE fucking video where any 1.6 player uses actual 1-3 stop bursts and precisely places shots with it, period. ONE. It's unlikely you'll ever find it. Spray and pray is the method of CS players in both games.
It sounds like you've never even seen the fucking game honestly. I've only ever seen one fucking video in my life of another person burst aiming accurately and that player was on source.

>This proves
That you love ad-homs that are based on nothing but your own retardation. You've given no actual refutations, thrown nothing but BS. Go back to being 8 yourself.