/vr/ - Retro Games

>>1152757

This pretty much trumps any timeline theories. Nintendo is being pretty cool by putting out an official timeline, but it honestly doesn't mean anything.

That said, I'd put the CDi games after Adventure of Link, because they could only exist in the bleak future. Also most of the enemies were inspired from the first two games in all three CDi.... things.

>>1123737

When I was a kid trying to beat this I didn't know the pause trick OR experiment with the weapons enough to know that Electric Man's power was the most effective. I beat this asshole with the Megabuster and far too much patience.

>>1098494

So it's okay to discuss Metal Gear Solid Rising because the first game called MGS came out in 1998? No. That's not how things work here.

>>1082526

And yet that's not what is implied in the official timeline, and this also contradicts what you'd said earlier. Just because something could happen doesn't mean that it did. I could've fucked your mom last night, but I had to do laundry, so I wrote a story about it instead.

The timeline shown was of the hero failing, not of Zelda saving the day when that happened. You could assume that she did, but you'd be ignoring that an age of darkness came in just after Link lost.

Which also means that it isn't a connected timeline because it doesn't involve time travel of Link or Zelda (as directly stated). IE: It could be done without either person muddling with time.

Now I know you really think you're right, but you simply don't have any evidence for your assertions. You can believe what you want, but you're going to be called an idiot for ignoring the evidence.

>>965412

Given that the path is wide and has no obstructions they probably assumed only idiots would fall in. Their punishment would be re-fighting Ganon all over again.

It was a simpler time.

>>811602
>>>/out/

>>805229
>greentext fag greentexting

>>791028

They aren't comparable. Mario is about speed and beating dozens of levels, Megaman is absolute mastery of a dozen and a half or so levels. Their core gameplay is completely different.

I DO like Megaman 2 better, but either one is a fine game.

>>768047

I finished that game as a kid (I wasn't allowed to have a new game until I'd completed the previous) and it was awful. The magic system had only a handful of useful spells, the combat was repetitive and dull, the story and characters were nonexistent, and the basic melee attack was vastly more effective than the magic. The worst part is the game is completely without difficulty of any kind. Just let the enemies kill you and you'll wake up at the nearest inn with 1hp. There's no reason to bother using healing magic for anything but the boss battles.

Easily one of the worst games on the system. The graphics aren't too terrible, but they really just look like a slight upgrade from Mario 64 in spite of coming out 2 years after.

Reproduction carts aren't inherently bad. The price is.

Still waiting on an official release date.

>>629429

But if he's never played the game before he couldn't possibly know exactly what to do. At the very least he's unlikely to "know it like the back of his hand" just because you might. You do realize that people don't share all their memories via the internet, right?