/vr/ - Retro Games

>>8386978
>>8386948
git gud scrub

>>7481047
Not entirely sure, but it may have to do with PS1 games running at 240p.

an excellent game

>>5757810
I think GTA1 is better than GTA2

GTA1 is excellent

the way above average difficulty makes it all the more satisfying to nail each mission

>>4958536
get good

>>4936663
Grand Theft Auto

>>4498885
the first GTA is excellent
GTA2 is good but I don't like it as much

>>4083663
Older /vr/ does - the ones that are actually capable of playing video games. Expect the '90s born shitters to hate it.

Never played the PSX/Dreamcast ports so I couldn't tell you but the PC versions were excellent. I highly doubt the PlayStation version was better than PC.

How about a good old fashioned webm bread?

Requesting some rad GTA2 webms, too.

>>3453165
In general you want to ignore /vr/'s "opinion" about FPS (doom memer opinion). It's pretty much a complete joke. Every FPS has its own strengths/weaknesses and is enjoyable for different reasons, but this doesn't register with the doom babbies because their gameplay ability is severely gimped.

>>3396561
The radio stations are actually well put together _radio stations_, rather than playlists of most popular songs of a given genre from the game's timeline (which are licensed and not even an original soundtrack).

The difficulty of missions in the 2D games is actually quite challenging, with missions being generally better overall than in most 3D games. And you're not constrained by a story or plot to play through some simple missions first. So essentially you have more freedom than in the 3D games.

Controls for shooting and driving are good for a 2D game, you can't really compare it to controls for a 3D game. Apples to oranges. Still, just because you need some practice to master them, instead of being hand-held by a tutorial for every action (some even being locked down in the beginning of the game), doesn't make them worse.

>You're either drunk with nostalgia or just a massively contrarian hipster if you think otherwise.
well ain't that some projecting

>>3163724
no