/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10932652
>caring about retro gaming opinions from the internet
Lol, lmao. The game is nothing special in terms of difficulty and is only truly difficult for retarded players who ignore their previous failures and never change their approach. If you die from a jump, return to that spot, and jump in the same way, you should immediately stop playing video games and get your brain examined to ensure it's actually there.

If you refer to a game as janky, even if it has unconventional control design, I'm going to assume you're an emotionally unstable impatient manchild incapable of teaching yourself anything beyond the obvious. Most anons on this site refuse to play anything that wasn't already curated and pre-approved by other anons because they cannot possibly imagine spending any time playing a game they're not guaranteed to like. These are the same anons that are better off watching let's plays rather than getting mad that classic games don't play identically to contemporary ones.

Classic gaming has been fashionable for over a decade now and anyone that prefers modern titles will pretend to have formed their own opinions on earlier entries without ever playing them personally beyond a cursory inspection. Modern gamers expect an accessable experience inherently making them unable to appreciate classic design for the value it serves and instead focus on how it contrasts to modern design preferences. If you can't appreciate classic design on its own and feel a need to make comparisons to contemporary games containing decades of design advancement and a completely different user landscape, you can go ahead and keep calling yourself a retro gamer because that's exactly what you are. A retrograde gamer.

Compulsively attempting to plow through a game the first playthrough is the best way to ensure you remember as little as possible, if you can't appreciate replaying a game go binge walkthroughs.

>>9243328
>Just do what Nintendo did....Go from [gen 4] to [gen 5]. For Sega, go from [gen 4] to [gen 6].

>>9024294
>that would be how the English approximation of the final name sounds. "Haidarashitei". "Hy-draw-city".

>>8817214
Your lack of refutation indicates you've tacitly conceded

>>7714513
>I'm not fragile! You're all these shitty things for unrelated reasons