/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10318897
Most of the time, I don't really feel like there's a point. Like before, you didn't really have people sharing cool looking Artstation slop. The fact that a robit did it doesn't suddenly make it neat or adds extra value, unless it's someone misguided enough to think that the AI art is "their" art. Sometimes, the idea behind the prompt might be neat and worth discussing, but you didn't need the art to do that before, and most of the time the art is just dropped without context or a desire to discuss, so usually it's not for actual discussion. Most that'd have a purpose is for funny shit, but most people are less funny with their prompts than they think.

If you actually were using AI art as a tool, like creating concepts or art for a jam you're actually gonna follow through with, or like that one dude who was generating skyboxes, then that feels like it actually has merit to discuss or be interesting. If you're just generating art to share, then it doesn't really have a point, including to just share it in the first place.

For example, what if someone was making a continuation of the Deathball wad and wanted to include actual teams with logos but didn't have an artist, so they were using AI to create them? That would be actually interesting. If you generated a picture of a bunch of Marines and Revs playing football, it'd be nothing.