/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9773934
You are utterly mad if you're trying to insist that the SNES has better sound than the Amiga.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWfW7o-i41Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdDhFri95Qs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIt72HXmLlg&t=89s
I am sorry that your Nintendo can't even beat hardware from wholly 5 years prior, it must be embarassing.

>>8173160
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmcS-Br95r4
Quite funny that the Amiga, despite being almost 5 years older than the SNES, could easily do 3D games, a feat which the SNES required a cheating and expensive expansion chip to accomplish at a comparable framerate. This is thanks to the Amiga's 3 TIMES faster CPU.

>>7498087
>>7498137
Christ what a low fucking effort troll. Triggered and butthurt nintendrones are still, after all this time, trying to cope with that the shit SNES, despite being 4 years newer than the Amiga, needed cheating and expensive expansion chips to do basic 3D games, something the Amiga could easily do on stock hardware.

>>7438976
Congratulations, I specifically listed the Amiga last because I knew you would beeline right past all those other far superior options. How does it feel to be this pathetically predictable? You're not able to cope with there being so many better 16-bit platforms, so you try to pick on the easiest target, the computer from a whole 4 years prior, but even there, your precious shit SNES is BTFO, where the Amiga can easily do 3D games without any expensive and cheating expansion chips, unlike your overrated and ultimately quite poor SNES. It's really too bad, the 16-bit generation is the finest generation of gaming out there, if you would only spend some time outside of your shitty Nintendo box you might come to discover just how much you're missing out on.

>>7316525
You nintendrones always have to pick on the Amiga, don't you? Always the "easy target", the computer released a whole 4 years prior to the shit SNES, and not something more recent. Perhaps that's because you well know that you have no argument against other hardware the SNES was competing against?
And even so, nintendrones still have no answer for why the Amiga, despite being so much older than the shit SNES, can easily do 3D games on stock hardware, whilst the SNES needed cheating and expensive expansion chips to even come close. It's quite pitiful, really.

>>7274749
Yes, Amiga, as the Amiga, despite being a whole 4 years older than the shit SNES, has a CPU that is 3 times faster. Nintendrones still have zero explanation for why the Amiga can play 3D games on stock hardware whilst the shit SNES requires an expensive and cheating expansion chip.

>>7255147
If you think that looks appalling, you had best to not look up what the shit SNES was attempting to pass for it's 3D games, despite being 4 years newer and using an expensive cheating expansion chip, they are far worse. Your shit SNES completely fails to deliver as usual. You want to know why Street Fighter sucked on the Amiga? It was quickly thrown together by incompetent devs, who were simultaneously developing it for the Atari ST, which was almost as much of a piece of shit as the SNES was. Simple as. Now, can you nintendrones answer why the shit SNES was totally incapable of competing with even the most basic of 3D games without using expensive and cheating FX chips?