/vr/ - Retro Games

>>11031391
>classic disingenuous oot fan shit
It was well received and most sites with user reviews are now gone but you just hadn't tried anon, that's why.

The reality is that, wether a game could even be objectively good, somebody will give it a bad review. Gamefaqs will provide here and there's lots of reviews with only a couple of negative ones, so it's clearly *very* well received. But don't kid yourself there's no detractors either, there were the same basic issues being discussed then too.

>>11031391 #
>classic disingenuous oot fan shit
It was well received and most sites with user reviews are now gone but you just hadn't tried anon, that's why.

The reality is that, wether a game could even be objectively good, somebody will give it a bad review. Gamefaqs will provide here and there's lots of reviews with only a couple of negative ones, so it's clearly *very* well received. But don't kid yourself there's no detractors either, there were the same basic issues being discussed then too.

>>11031391
>classic disingenuous oot fan shit
It was well received and most sites with user reviews are now gone but you just haven't tried anon, that's why.

The reality is that, wether a game could even be objectively good, somebody will give it a bad review. Gamefaqs will provide here and there's lots of reviews with only a couple of negative ones, so it's clearly *very* well received. But don't kid yourself there's no detractors either.