/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10600210
>would rather have the one that can't play PS2 games than one that plays PS1 and PS2 games

I'm dumb and I need help from people here that are smarter than me when it comes to shaders...

Is there a way to objectively measure which are the shaders that are less, or more, demanding? Of course, when I select a shader and it runs, it can be implied that my PC can handle it, and if I choose a shader and suddently my RetroArch UI slows down... then it's more demanding, but I'm sure there must be a way to know which are the most, or least, demanding when it's more subtle.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, if I have a couple of shaders, and neither do something drastic like slow down my UI, and both run decently, how do I know which is harsher for my PC in the long run?

>>10572061
>no gameplay of sorts
>immediately proceeds to explain the gameplay

>>10527885
I don't know how you got "I ONLY play to get it off a checklist and make the numbers go up" out of "Do you go for 100% completion or not?" and at this point I think you just have some truly bad reading comprehension, anon.

>>10458154
>the Neo-Geo failed as a home console
Fuck back off to pooptube, reasons-why-failed noob.

>>10459869
>Vita was complete trash compared to any gameboy.

>>10342697
>SotN
Uses a 3D engine. As most playstation games do.

>>10328906
>Dreamcast did a lot more right than the Saturn,
Like what? The cheap, failing PSU? Or the poorly designed Dreamcast controller? Or the half assed, playstation style party games on the DC that no one bought? Perhaps the buggy as hell Sanic Adv game? Or is it the cheap DC optical drive / failing lasers? Hows the weather in bizarro world today?