/vr/ - Retro Games

>>5103501
>was not aware of this, can't find any comparisons tho. u lyin?

>>4084885
>>4084907
The 100x has a crappy VDP with 15-bit texturing versus the later models which had full 24-bit. Pic on left is 100x, right is representative of all later hardware revisions.

Also the power supply overheats and cooks the laser over time, metal rails or not.

>>4037909
The PlayStation itself was compromised, at least in earlier hardware revisions, as it had 5-bit per channel colour output vs 8-bit per channel of later models.

I imagine Capcom made the decision to maintain consistency across all hardware in circulation. They also likely used blue debug consoles for development and playtesting rather than green ones.

>>4018731
7502 beats 1002 into a cocked hat btw

>>3977001
No, that was banding.

>>3910908
How many of those ports did you actually use though?

Also...
>SCPH-100x on left, SCPH-10x on right.

>>3887603
>1001
oy vey, keep it

>>3845526
>Emulation is flawed, and original hardware and software is not

kek

>>3810363
Here's the video that was linked in the thread:
https://youtu.be/_HKjcxCuRfM

>>3661982
Yeah, it also went beyond the RAM swap.

Later versions of the GPU fixed a bug in silicon to do with how texture dithering is processed.

This considerably cleans up the visual quality. On that note, I believe SGRAM actually has some minor performance improvements over VRAM. You could almost argue that Sony did a lite-upgrade of PS1 hardware compared to its launch day release.