/vr/ - Retro Games

>alright time to continue playing through the 100 Greatest WADs list
>Requiem is pretty good so far
>MAP09 is giving me a real sense of deja vu though
>a REAL sense of deja vu
>then I get to the red key part of the map and realize it's literally a map I've already played from earlier in the 100 Greatest WADs list
What the fuck why did they consider it okay to take this if it was already in a published and apparently popular level set
MAP08 was also really similar to a level I had played on the list but it was at least just reusing the concept (with much better execution than the previous level) and didn't actually take the same level, alter a couple rooms and consider that done

>>6202131
>but the way it's used is NOT
You just reminded me of when I was playing through the 100 Wads of All Time list, I think it was in the 1994 section, and one level in one of the wads had a maze filled with FIREBLU that flashed back and forth to a different, yellow and black texture.

>>5621280
Plutonia MAP07 has too many enemies for my lizard brain to handle. There's not enough rocket ammo for both the mancubi and the revenants, trying to kill the former with the SSG takes forever and generally takes away most of my health, and I don't know if it's even possible to kill the latter with the SSG given how high up they are. Is there a "trick" I'm not getting?

>interested in participating in the new HUMP
>"No more slots left,we have achieved getting 9 mappers for this project!Due to this project filling up so early i decided that the project will be enlarged if we get more than 4 mappers in the "interested mappers" list (which is highly unlikely) untill 02/07 and if only one mapper emerges untill that time i shall open my slot up for them. (i will still be making a map because i like mapping and because it can act as a replacement map for if a member decides to randomly quit in the middle of the session)"
Well I sure fucking hope they enlargen it. That was extremely fast.

>>4845327

>>4786989
Don't try me, anon.

>>4716117
wow this is horrible

>>4121987
>The order of any franchise should always be chronology and not order of release.
I disagree with that. Some games are prequels to others but are still written with the expectation that you played the earlier games in the series that come "later." In something like Metroid I don't think it would kill your enjoyment but I still think it's a shaky statement at best.
>>4122358
Isn't Samus Returns being made by the Lords of Shadow devs?