/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3103189
Nigger can't you fucking read? I don't participate in the fighting game scene, so that argument is entirely irrelevant. Fighting games are arguably the best multiplayer experiences on retro consoles, considering the level of depth available not seen in run-n-guns or puzzle titles.

So, let's break down your comment to see where your derision lies:

>[I'm of the opinion that] Anybody who enjoys/acts [in excitement in response to playing well] needs to [stop liking what I don't like]] it's [giving] video games [a bad image, in my opinion].

So, you hate people that are good at these games because you see them as a bunch of shouting chimps. That is totally logical and not completely contrived in any way.

>Fighting games turn humans into [overexcited sperglords]. [I don't like fighting games (we know.)[ Please take it off this planet [as I don't want to learn how to play, and it makes me jealous to see people better than I am at video games].

Your bias is showing

>E sports? really? so you [live normally, and yet] now you're clinging to this? thank you for giving me another batch of trash shit tier games [in my opinion] because you [generic insult] can't [appease my selfish nature]

So, you aren't willing to memorize a bunch of button inputs. That's fine, nobody's forcing you to.

Nice refutation, really got me there with all those objective and logical arguments.

Have you ever tried not being a dick for no reason? It makes you a much more likeable person.

>>2878458
>I'm a parakeet
No, you're a human, with fingers that can type. Go be a furry somewhere else.

Irrelevant things aside, did you even read what I posted? If you're bringing up off-topic things in passing, don't. If you hadn't, you wouldn't HAVE a "third poster". The conversation would stay on topic because there's no topic to derail it with.

You proved MY point. You actually think saying stuff like "I want to see pictures of your daughter" on a retro gaming board is acceptable. You *actually* said that. And better yet, that third post is entirely likely to derail the thread, and you're only claiming it didn't because you're talking about theoreticals.

You said it yourself. "the poster not posting on topic isn't the problem". Yes, it is. It is entirely the problem.

>>2774471
Hahahah. Stay mad.

>>2660706
>I shall give my opinion with nothing to support it! That'll convince him!

Surely you can do better than that.

>>2205353
Because this is the dumbest argument ever: http://info.sonicretro.org/File:Sonic3_jp_manual_40_41.gif

Ha-I-Do-Ro-Shi-Te-I. Hydro City.

But feel free to pat your ten-year-old self on the back for being so clever, good for you.