[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

Search:


View post   

>> No.2014951 [View]
File: 30 KB, 600x337, 1412813483288.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2014951

>>2014925
Sometimes that doesn't even work. Often their AI allows them to immediately shoot the split second they walk around a corner.

Doesn't help that I'm playing on IADI.

>> No.1992202 [View]
File: 32 KB, 600x337, 10520_600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1992202

>>1992134
>with open contempt for the mod community.

Before anyone considers this to be exaggeration or trollbait, no. Here is a list of actual quotes:

>People [...] save because they have to stop playing to do other stuff and want to resume later. But the perceived abuse that comes with allowing this is something that modders should live with - and not go out of their way to break the engine and annoy people who want to use the save function for this or any other reason.
>This is a very large part of the reason why I scaled back my involvement in engine development so much. 4-5 years ago I had the feeling that what I did still mattered. I don't have that anymore.
>Some of what you people come up with baffle me. The amount of abuse people could cause with this is limitless - and to be blunt, I don't care about any supposed "potential" people can do with it.
>There's a certain faction of modders here that think they have the right to demand everything but completely forget that ZDoom is named after Doom - and its main purpose will forever to play Doom (and the other Doom engine based games of course.) So (big surprise!) the main focus of is features will remain the game it was originally designed for and mods made for that game.
>To me your non-Doomy stuff is a secondary consideration at best and if you want features that get in the way or can be abused to get in the way of Doom - I'll say STOP.
>Why the hell should I even bother considering this? If I encountered any wad with [feature] I would drag it straight into the recycling bin where it belongs.
>In case you have not noticed, any worthwhile level there is perfectly makes do with the existing implementation.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]