/vr/ - Retro Games

>>7406559
You do realize that was done pre 1500s before European painting was solely doing 1:1 copies of references right? Even then, it looks like shit. It lacks design quality and overrall looks like an awkward mess. If you think this is on par with woodblocks I don't know what to tell you. There is way better medieval European art than that. You picked a something that looks like the sketchbook of a 12 year old.
>>7406584
>doesn't post any artwork that proves my statement wrong
>has no quotes about or arguments about how Europeans weren't doing 1:1 copies of references
>instead sperges out about modernism
Nice. And let me guess, da joos right?
>ebil whitoids who never invented anything
Show me where I said this once, please

Japanese woodblocks are objectively more creative from an artistic standpoint than European. European paintings were always about how accurately someone could make paint on canvas look like a model or reference. Europeans never much cared for design quality except maybe composition and always had basic perspective portraying people like they were front and center on a stage. When it comes down to creativity, the Japs won.

Btw, western artists from the 1800s loved Asian art btw. Read about Vincent Van Gogh, he was a total weeb that was fascinated with the "ebil" Japanese art you hate so much.