/vr/ - Retro Games

>>7015212
Btvs ended in like 2003ish and the characters in it had said by the by at least once in an earlier episode, as it is mostly a 90s show and all I think it's 90s vernacular, hence why it's dead now. It's not post 2000s.

>>7015209
Why pray tell do the bean meme drinkers live in thine head rent free?

What even are they?

>>6691027
His ankle is fucked. that's why you don't run down the stairs kids.

>>6691048
Though it probably should be.

>>6229202
>>6229263
i just stuck a brand new 240 gb ssd in a 25mhz 386sx laptop purely to spite you. it can only see the first 504 mb and i dont even care, slurp my taint

Dumb thread

>>3109218
>The entire metagame

>>2734837
>quicksaves

>>2694631
>and a framemeister

>>1006293
The 68k and Z80 were some of the most common processors in the 70's and 80's for computers, and there were a lot of arcade machines that used them in combo throughout the 80's and 90's.

>>1006315
Yes and no. If you're talking about the "adding processor bits together" like the Atari Jaguar and N64 did to come up with their bit rankings, then yeah that was them not even following what makes a console a certain bit rating to begin with, the bit rating of either it's CPU or most powerful processor. Jaguar and N64 are both 32-bit consoles, just like every other 5th Generation console was.

The bit designation of a processor isn't very useful by itself without context provided by the other statistics, but generally a higher bit processor is better than a lower bit one. You'd have to be an idiot to think that 16-bit processors like the 68k and i386 aren't better than 8-bit Z80, Motorola 6800, Intel 8080, or MOS Technology 6510.