/vr/ - Retro Games

>>3962379
>>3963609


The game you linked ironically.

But also Final Fantasy - ANY game in the series. Why this blasphemy you implore... its due to missing most of them and then I played Chrono Trigger and it has most of the same mechanics but without any of the random encounters.

I saw someone play FF7 and the lack of health potions plus the random encounters (rather stupid ones) didn't make the game look playable at all.

Im not a big fan of open world games like that, where you're dropped into it and its like "here you go, have fun". End up wandering to all sorts of different places not knowing where im supposed to go because each one only has proper quests or locations opened up after you trigger other things.
> not interested in playing it over and over again to find out the correct place to go.

Tabletop RPG is better because at least I can find something to do, look for trouble or whatever, and the plot eventually will find me (due to DM frustration).

>>3963114
I agree, there's alot of N64 games that I just go WTF for. The technology wasnt good enough and they didnt understand the kind of mechanics necessary to run a game like that in 3d (for instance, no fixed 8 way movement).

Zelda OOT I felt like this about too, and its almost identical to Super Mario 64 in so many ways.

They should have done a much comfier (read: SOTN level comfy) version of Zelda for the 64 and incorporated 3d effects into it, but left it as a 2D game. Im talking like Minish Cap level dynamics, special moves.

> and a Swordbeam for fucks sake

A couple other games I could never get into were Earthworm Jim or Donkey Kong.

Even though the screenshots I saw of DK looked rather impressive graphics wise - I absolutely fucking hate Monkeys and Gorillas. Thats the kinda thing I ought to be shooting or killing in a game, not supporting.


>>3963638
OP was saying games you Cant Get Into despite the hype. Not which ones you loved. Unless thats what you're saying here.