/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9895935
>And yet you say one doesn't count.
Stop playing guess who and quote it.
>that just gives you more to play with?
You really think people are playing 1cc the first time around until they beat it? No wonder you're so opposed.
>It makes more sense as a requirement to say you've mastered a game
Mastered is definitely more telling, though I prefer the idea of physically fighting the game, like you're "beating" it. It's a lot more visceral to say you've beaten a game rather than to say you cleared a game, I feel that should be reflected in the difficulty of the playstyle.
Yes, you can say you beat games without having 1cc'd them. There's nothing stopping you. It just feels inaccurate to use violent language for what is supposed to be an intended experience.
>that's autism
Some folks got no appreciation for nuance
>shitflinging ensues
Again welcome to 4chan
>I'm using the actual meanings that everyone else uses. Not some random specified definitions made up by some losers who don't think others are as worthy as them.
>>Written without even a hint of self-awareness. Ah, irony.
>they still agreed with me
still demonstrating your appreciation for validation from internet strangers
I swear half this site forgot what being anonymous was for
>1ccing the game for yourselves isn't good enough and you have to shove it down other people's throats
Meanwhile you wanna share what games you viciously brutalized, I mean beat. Again, you're guilty of the very thing you condemn: Liking a game for how you play it. The fucking atrocity!!

>>9879187
>>9879220
>If I refuse to accept the fact, it ceases to be a fact!

>>9243895
That's just it though, killer apps drive design choices. Despite the popularity of the diamond pad, the six-button layout refuses to die because of the arcade legacy of fighting games. Frankly this is all partisan, has nothing to do with objective truth, and ultimately boils down to preference. But if we accepted that, then we wouldn't have so many fun threads to shout at each other with!

>>8954409
>Yeah well that's a false dichotomy because, because... because I say so
Good for you. Maybe substantiate your assertions when you make them
>Nobody cares about what fucking data format it's stored in
Saying "nobody cares" in the middle of a debate can only indicate "I have no counter argument so I've instead convinced myself that everyone already agrees with me so I can emotionally recover from being wrong". Well guess what, objectivity doesn't care how many people do or don't believe in it. It's objective. The game is objectively processing 2D vector map data to render 3D perspective illusions, you refused to offer a rebuttal because the very assertion is somehow personally insulting to you, failure to rebut means you have tacitly conceded.
>you're going to have to reach up your ass further to find another stupid metric
If you can't refute how the engine runs on 2D vector map data, what's the point? You've already tacitly conceded
>>8954652
I know you're being facetious, and yet raycasting really does scan on the first dimension along the plane of the 2D vector map data for rendering information. Really all you did was draw attention to the engine using 2D vector map data again.
>>8954818
Project harder ignorami

>>8824257
Did you forget that you're on a forum? Where people go to discuss things? God you must be debilitatingly insecure to react so negatively to someone disagreeing with you, despite the fact they're you're the one doing the disagreement in the first place. The irony is palpable.

>>7698673
Taking shortcuts to feel satisfaction in what is supposed to be a hobby is for impatient narcissistic manchildren and the fact you think this is about showing off, on an anonymous forum, proves that