/vr/ - Retro Games

>>7282181
So tell me, what's the 7th entry called.

>>6203841
>unilateral
Congrats on not knowing what that word means.

>If version of a game displays at 1280x1024 but the other one only displays at 1280x720
The texture resolutions disparity is larger than that, but nice strawman.

>then the first one is better even if it runs at half the framerate
You can get equal framerate on the PC version.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkHv-es9aSQi15dMYzWxZ-hjOPUlnKRFz

>but it introduced a dynamic lighting
It used an extremely basic fragment lighting method that wasn't even as advanced at the lighting in Turok 2, which cast shadows in real time. But, overall, it was an improvement over the PC version's lighting, which still had real time lighting, but not to the extent of the N64 version.

>By including sequenced audio, they couldn't have the audio fidelity, but could do dynamic music and include a larger range of tunes.
So, basically just repeating what was stated previously
>noticeably worse audio that spikes more often from compression, even though they out-right lie and say that they improved the audio quality on the N64
And ignoring the fact that they don't simply mention the "range" of audio, but literally say that they improved the audio quality on the actual port?

>Oh and who can forget that Factor 5 actually refined the gameplay
Null and void since it used the fucking N64 controller. It doesn't matter what game it is, if it uses the N64 controller, it's fucking awful. They were probably forced to improve it to make it at-all manageable on that abomination of an abortion.

Jesus, I really hope this post is a cringy attempt at trolling, since you're a complete fucking moron if not.

>>6125224
>REEEE, MIMAPS AREN'T FILTERING EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE A METHOD OF FILTERING

>REEEEEE

Holy dog-shit batman, a literal brain-void! Grab the wiki entries, they're like poison to it's negative intellect!