[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

Search:

View post   
>> No.10942580 [View]
File: 409 KB, 670x930, no ARC reviews.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10942580

>>10942576
The ARC was glitched where people couldn't review it. But the RG Nano originally had a 2/5 star rating before Anbernic just hid the review scores from the product page, and then later just hid all scores for all products like you see today.

>> No.10532358 [View]
File: 409 KB, 670x930, no ARC reviews.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10532358

>>10532069
>>10532332
Hold on a tick, the RG35XX+ already has three reviews while the ARC handhelds have none. Maybe the ARC review link specifically is fucked? But they did originally show RG Nano reviews, but last I saw when it was at 2/5 stars, they then disappeared. Maybe ARC purchasers such as yourself were just gypped out of giving it a review due to a glitch/Anbernic error.

>> No.10532337 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 409 KB, 670x930, no ARC reviews.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10532337

>>10532069
>>10532332
Wait what the fug, I just checked and there's already three RG35XX+ reviews. Why aren't the ARC reviews showing up? Maybe ARC purchasers had a similar experience where they simply couldn't rate it. What the fuck?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]