/vr/ - Retro Games

>>4431441
Piss because when coming out of a hot girl, it'd be hot.

Anyone have any other Mean Bean Machine reaction images?

I'll just copy/paste myself rating the classic Sonic games in another thread.

>1: Sonic 3 Complete
For the large amount of generally high quality content:
>more zones
>more branching paths
>3 functionally distinct characters
>Knuckles taking different paths through most acts
>improved co-op
>addition of minibosses
>act and zone transitions
>remixed music for second acts
>decent story telling

>2: Sonic 1
Because it's a more well thought out game than its sequels (example: rings make sense here as they're required for special stages, you need to hold on to them till the end of the act, and there aren't nearly as many rings or shields as in the sequels, so it takes some skill to get and keep 50 rings, and getting an extra life with 100 rings is more infrequent), it's somewhat challenging, and it has the best level design of any of the classics largely because there's no spindash.

>3: Sonic CD
I don't enjoy playing it as much with its focus on exploration, but I can clearly see what it is trying to do, I think it succeeds, and I respect it for that, and for doing something a little different.
Also, that soundtrack and those aesthetics. Love 'em.

>4. Sonic 2
It isn't as well thought out as Sonic 1 and doesn't have its level design (Sonic 2 has the worst level design of the classics imo, still great though) or challenge.
It doesn't have Sonic 3's amount of content.
It doesn't have Sonic CD's uniqueness.
In every area it falls short of some other Sonic game.