/vr/ - Retro Games

>>5651645
>the /vr/ chart
... is deliberately inclusive.
OP specifically implied he was looking for non-action RPGs. The inclusive definition does not apply.
Zelda is a series known for its puzzles. Chances are OP is well fucking aware of Zelda.
Without even knowing anything about any of the definitions, bringing up Zelda only proves that you are a complete idiot who can't follow basic language.

>>5142298
>Which is absolutely not true to the point that it's funny to me.
God you are a retarded faggot. You have utterly failed demonstrate even simple comprehension of any point I have made, much less provide any interesting counter-arguments. All you have done is flatly restate your contrary position and incorrectly sum up mine.